Michael Jewess, CIPA/ITMA CPD WEBINAR on professional ethics, 4 July 2016:  BIBLIOGRAPHY (compiled 28 June 2016, slightly modified to cover a question that was put at the end of the webinar)

(For Michael Jewess’s home page, click HOME.)





      Michael Jewess, Inside intellectual property (CIPA, London 2013), see www.researchinip.com/iip.htm.  Chapter 2 sets out the arguments in this article at more length.  Chapter 1 deals with "Legal Professional Quality".  Chapter 5 deals with patenting, including ethical challenges on arising from patent novelty searching.  Chapter 8 deals with branding, including the ethical challenges which trade mark cluttering presents to the practitioner.  Chapter 15 deals with the practice’s financial model, at page 312 specifically with charging practices that can misalign the interests of the practice with those of the client.


      IPReg, Rules of conduct for patent attorneys, trade mark attorneys and other regulated persons (first issued September 2009, including amendments to April 2016, commencement date 1 January 2015):  http://ipreg.org.uk/wp-content/files/2012/08/IPReg-Code-of-Conduct-April-2016-website.pdf.  Additional Guidance to Rule 11 issued by e-mail (http://ipreg.org.uk/pro/practice-development/client-accounts/) to all private practices and sole practioners:  http://ipreg.org.uk/wp-content/files/2015/10/Client_Monies_Guidance_10_Sep_15_Final_with_footnotes.pdf.

      IPReg, Special rules of professional conduct applicable to regulated persons conducting litigation or exercising a right of audience before the courts (commencement date 15 September 2011, updated May 2015).  Amendment of Guidance to Rule 3.4 proposed by IPReg in September 2013 not yet made.  See http://ipreg.org.uk/wp-content/files/2012/08/Litigators_Code_for_website_2015.pdf and http://ipreg.org.uk/pro/rules-and-regulations/litigators-code/.

      Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation, Regulation on discipline for professional representatives (in force from 21 October 1977, amended to 2007), published in consolidated form Supplement to Official Journal EPO 1/2016, 126-137 (2016), available under http://patentepi.com/en/the-institute/rules-and-regulations.html.


      European Patent Institute, The code of conduct of the Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office (decided 13 November 1979, supplemented and amended to 2001), published in consolidated form in Supplement to the Official Journal EPO 1/2016, 120-125 (2016), available under http://patentepi.com/en/the-institute/rules-and-regulations.html.

      Solicitors Regulation Authority, SRA principles 2011 (as amended to 1 November 2015) and Code of conduct 2011 (as amended to 1 April 2016), included in SRA Handbook, Version 16 (1 April 2016), available under http://www.sra.org.uk.




      The Damages-Based Agreements Regulations, SI 2013 No 609.




      IPReg, Practice note & guidance on liens on client IP and enduring powers of attorney (intended to compensate the practitioner if bills are not paid), http://ipreg.org.uk/wp-content/files/2013/04/IPReg_Practice_Guidance_Jan_20132.pdf.





      Bribery Act, 2010.  Section 7(2) refers to "adequate procedures" to protect clients and practices against criminal liability.


     IPReg, Anti-money laundering (undated, probably 2014), http://ipreg.org.uk/pro/practice-development/anti-money-laundering/.

      Serious Crime Act, 2015.  Section 45 (came into force 3 May 2015) lowers the threshold for criminal liability of professionals (among others) of knowledge of organised criminal activity for criminal liability.





      SRA, Ethnic diversity in law firms - understanding the barriers (May 2010), available at http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/policy-campaigns/research-trends/research-publications/documents/ethnic-diversity-in-law-firms---understanding-the-barriers/.


      SRA, Diversity data collection (updated to 1 June 2016), http://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/code-of-conduct/guidance/guidance/diversity-data-collection.page.


       SRA, Diversity questionnaire (undated), http://www.sra.org.uk/documents/sra/equality-diversity/example-diversity-questionnaire.doc.   


       Nicholas Fox, Recruitment and diversity in the patent and trade mark professions (IPReg, 2013), http://ipreg.org.uk/wp-content/files/2013/04/Recruitment_and_Diversity_in_the_Patent_and_Trade_Mark_Professions_Final.pdf


         IPReg, Business plan for 2016, http://ipreg.org.uk/wp-content/files/2012/09/Business_Plan_2016.pdf.        


         IP Inclusive, A charter for equality, diversity, and inclusion (undated, probably 2015 or 2016), http://www.ipinclusive.org.uk/charter.html






      Legal Services Act, 2007.  Section 15 in relation to in-house practitioners engaging in provision of reserved legal activities as defined in Section 12 is an "overriding obligation" referred to in the IPReg Code, Rule 2.


      IPReg, Rights to conduct litigation and rights of audience and other reserved legal activities certification rules 2012 (commencement date 31 December 2012, as amended to 19 January 2015):  http://ipreg.org.uk/wp-content/files/2013/01/IPReg_Regulations_Post-ABS_Website.pdf.  These rules mainly with litigation, but under Rule 9 patent and trade mark attorneys are allowed to draft deeds relating to intellectual property rights and to administer oaths.+


      IPReg, Registered Bodies Regulations, 2015 (commencement date 1 January 2015):  http://ipreg.org.uk/wp-content/files/2014/12/Registered_Bodies_Regulations_2015.pdf.     


      Legal Services Board, Statement of policy on section 15(4) of the Legal Services Act 2007: regulatory arrangements for in-house lawyers (February 2016) http://www.legalservicesboard.org.uk/Projects/thematic_review/pdf/201602_S15_Statement_Of_Policy.pdf.*




(For Michael Jewess’s home page, click HOME.)




+  Administering oaths is the discharge of a public office and cannot be done by an attorney or a solicitor for his own clients, and for which a small fixed fee is prescribed.  See Nicholas Fox, CIPA Journal, June 2013.   


*  This statement of policy followed the consultation, Legal Services Board, Are regulatory restrictions in practising rules for in-house lawyers justified? (26 February 2015) http://www.legalservicesboard.org.uk/Projects/thematic_review/pdf/S15_(In_House_Lawyers)_Discussion_Paper_(Feb_2015).pdf.